Cash is Good!

I have taken a part-time job, and it's definitely affecting my blogging time. I'll continue to post here as I am able.
Showing posts with label paid to write. Show all posts
Showing posts with label paid to write. Show all posts

Friday, August 31, 2012

Hidden Drawbacks of Online Jobs


While everyone, including myself, celebrates the advantages of working online, there are some real drawbacks. Occasionally, these can cause distress and even loss of income.

It’s important to note that there are at least three kinds of online jobs. At the bottom end of realistic earning potential are things like pay-to-click sites. At these you perform some menial task for which you are rewarded. Unless you break some kind of rule, like using a robot, the work is straightforward, but low-paying. My thoughts don’t have much to do with this type of job.

The next level of online job is where one performs some one-time service which must be accepted by a company or client. The most obvious of these jobs is freelance writing. However, there are some opportunities which involve completing some other kind of work.

At the highest level, one might have a job with a brick-and-mortar company, but all, or almost all, interaction is accomplished through a web interface.

If one is freelance writing, the text probably will need to be accepted by an editor or a client. One might think that if a good writer submits content there would be no problem. But this is not always the case. Editors may not be particularly expert. Editors may have agendas dictated by the company they work for. There are multiple style books for writing, which means that proper grammar isn’t always as inflexible as one might imagine. Except that a particular site may accept only a certain style that isn't the way one was taught. Editors have been known to even change content and make an article factually incorrect, while the author’s name remains on the byline. This can damage an author's credibility through no fault of their own.

Companies which rely on freelance writers have little incentive to explain themselves or work with authors. There is no contract involved, and there are plenty of other writers who will simply step in an fill any gaps to create content. The author's only recourse may be to walk away.

If one is fortunate enough to find a job which provides steady income for a service, which allows the employee to work from home through the internet, it may be difficult to imagine any problems.

However, one potential shortcoming is the isolation An employee may interact with only one or two other people in the entire company. In the long term, it’s difficult to assess one’s competence in this social vacuum.

There are bound to be frustrations with some aspects of the job. With no employee break room, and chats over lunch, one has no way to know if complaints are shared across the board, or if personal gripes would best be dropped.

If one has a poor or mediocre manager, there may be absolutely no way to circumvent the effects of bad management.

There is no way to compare one’s work against that of co-workers. A company usually sets standards for performance, which are usually unrealistically perfect. This, in itself, is not bad. Of course, any company wants to put out their best product all the time. In reality, humans can’t deliver perfection all the time. In a workplace, one informally has some sort of idea of how good or bad a job they are doing. With only internet contact, only mistakes may be noted. In other words, Until the job is completed to perfection there is only negative feedback, and probably no positive feedback for good work.

There is no chance (for example) to roll the eyes, and glance at a lab partner, sharing the pain of “unreasonable” demands. Such social interactions are how people make it through tough work days. With internet jobs, all one may get are negative messages such as “CASE REJECTED,” “NEEDS REVISION,” “NOT ACCEPTED,” etc.

For some people, internet jobs are the solution to various work dilemmas. Just be aware that there can be problems and frustrations with any type of job.

XXX

Sunday, September 11, 2011

Shared Reviews is Back On Line




Shared Reviews is back online, with the all-new format, and all content in place under a new category structure.

At this time, no authors can log in, till a few more bugs are worked out. Soon, a few beta testers will be given the privilege/ responsibility of being allowed to sign in and check out all the internal features. Once they determine that the new features are working correctly, Shared Reviews will be completely opened for all authors.

The new site looks great! The colors are smart, and I like the blues much better than the previous orange and gray.

At this time, we can't see anything about how the "game" is going to work. The promise is that it is going to be fun to write for rewards that can be exchanged for either real cash or certain perks. Payment in real money based on readers will continue, and hopefully increase.

A new linear system of levels has been revealed, but not yet fully explained. It goes from 1 to 50. 1 would be a true newbie. Peter Ejtel, owner and editor-in-chief, is at 50. My current rank is 33, the highest of any author to date. But I don't know yet what that will mean.

The new category structure is completely different, and it may take some shuffling to get all the content in the right place. Instead of each category getting more and more specific, they are now larger and broader. Under each category, such as Business & Office, there are only a few sub categories. In this case: Workplace & Operations, Careers & Work, Marketing & Advertising, and Other. Within each subcategory there can be product reviews, service reviews, general articles, how-tos, and opinion pieces. (roughly speaking... some review types don't fit all categories).

The beta testers were going to be announced by now, but they haven't been. I'm pretty sure I'm one of them, and I'm actually excited about Shared Reviews again. There's been a long dry patch that hasn't been much fun, but I think the new site is going to make up for that.

Like any content site, you have to build a body of work to earn very much, but it is possible to make more than a few dollars a month there if you work at it. The link below can be used to sign up under me, although right now no one can sign in or sign up. Check it out, though, and get ready for the all new Shared Reviews, a fun place to write.

Shared Reviews

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Shared Reviews Down to Install Site Redesign

Shared Reviews, which began as a site to review products, is temporarily offline. The site expanded a couple of years ago to include writing of articles. Because of the structure, traffic was not hurt by the Google shakeup in February 2011 as much as some of the content sites. Users are paid a percentage of the monthly revenues.

For months, CEO Peter Ejtel has been working behind the scenes to bring us a new interface. The promise is that this will be much more fun, faster, cleaner, and more bug free. Those of us who are active on the site can't wait for the changes!

The message claims that the site will be back by noon today, September 6, 2011. However, there's a typo in the notice which says "Easter Standard Time." Those of us who have watched delay after delay as changes to the site's code proved knotty, will see this as a great joke. We do hope Shared Reviews will be back before Easter!

When Shared Reviews comes back on line, everyone will be able to read content. However, the plan is that most authors will not be able to log in for an additional two weeks, while testing takes place. A few authors have been selected as beta testers. These people have agreed to accomplish a certain number of tasks during those two weeks in order to try to ferret out the bugs that will be inevitable. Hopefully, after that, the site will be back for all authors, established or new, to write and earn.

The changes include a complete category re-design which should make it much easier to place content. It's much less specific than the old structure, which required the making of new categories whenever someone wanted to write about something that didn't fit anywhere.

Peter has promised games, more instant rewards and a bright pleasing design. Here's hoping Shared Reviews becomes recognized as the great place to find quality content that it really is.

(Aw, shucks... he fixed the typo)

Shared Reviews


Monday, December 20, 2010

The "New" Shared Reviews- A Pay-to-Write Success Story


Shared Reviews is a content writing site, where you can earn money based on readership, rating of other content, and various achievement levels and contests. If you were familiar with the "old" Shared Reviews, there are quite a few changes.

I’m really happy with the new SR, and not just because I’m in first place. Here are some reasons:

1. You don’t have to beat out your friends to do well (which you had to do under the old voting system). This is, hands down, the greatest plus. Anyone who wants to put in the time can excel, if they are a reasonably good writer. Yes, I can write, but I’m in first place because I’ve spent a ton of time rating and writing. And my success doesn’t preclude anyone else from reaching the same level of ranking or payment or participation.

2. Your destiny is largely in your own hands. This is a corollary to #1. Except for receiving a certain number of rates, a person has great control over their own success. There isn’t full control over the number of readers we receive, but there is some. Writing good titles and using keywords is critical. You can make your content discoverable, and promote it. I should do it more!

3. The new system has a much more sustainable basis for payment. Now that the site has been around a while, Peter Ejtel (owner) knows pretty much what to expect from month to month in terms of income.

4. The rating system is constructive. With only a few exceptions, I think it’s working smoothly. Reviews are being improved in several ways. They are often made more discoverable. They are often made more understandable (key elements of SR writing included). The mechanics of the writing is improved.

Types of writing allowed

1. The site originated with product reviews. This is still the bulk of the content. There are almost 400 categories in which to place a review.

2. General content articles were added in early 2010. There are quite a few categories, and more are coming. You aren't limited to given titles (like you are at Helium). There is no upfront payment, but everyone is paid based on readership (previously only top reviews in each category received compensation)

3. Within a few months there is going to be content writing for upfront pay offered to those writers who qualify. This has gone through Alpha testing, and people who qualified for that were paid quite well.

Rating system actually works

Members who have achieved a certain level of experience and skill earn the title of Publisher-Rater. As such they have the privilege (and responsibility- but it's a reasonable level) to rate other articles. When an article is rated, the author is notified, and he or she can edit that article, making the changes noted by the raters. Raters also earn on the readership of content they've rated (at a lower level than the author). This not only generates more income, but it improves overall content on the site.

Articles with high ratings are queued higher on searches, so that people see good content first.

This would be a great time to sign up at Shared Reviews

Sunday, November 21, 2010

Shared Reviews Update


In October, I posted about a major change at the Review and Content site known as Shared Reviews. Those changes are now in their second month of being live, preceded by a month of beta testing.

I think that the system is working quite well. You might think I'm saying that because I'm currently in the number ONE spot. That's certainly nice, but it's not really why I like the changes.

Although not as many previous members have checked in to see how the site now works as would be ideal, the people who are participating are sure to see the rewards.

Rating
One of the new keys to success is to be able to objectively and constructively rate existing and new reviews for content and writing expertise. Only people at a certain rank are able to rate other reviews. When content is rated, the review/article is unlocked for editing. The author may then make changes to improve the content. This raises the overall quality of material on the site.

Readers
Payments for pageviews are only awarded for views from "readers." This is strictly defined to prevent gaming, traffic exchanges, etc. No internal clicks from Shared Reviews count. The tradeoff is that each time a page is "read" it's value is going to be higher. That value will depend on the amount of money in the monthly pot.

Payouts
Due to database issues, we still don't know what we made for October. Owner, Peter Ejtel, says they are trying to get the problems sorted out by the end of November, and process payments. But, here's how it works. Each month there is a pot of money, guaranteed to be no less than $1000. (Based on $2 per new content item, but never lass than $1000.) Half of that goes to authors, based on their readers. The other half goes to raters. Each content item can be rated by up to five members. Those five people will split the other half, based on the readers. If a review/article does not have five rates, the unused payout will be rolled into the next month's pot.

Quick estimates place the first month's payout around $0.01 cent for each "read." Here's how I figure that. Estimated official readers for all of Nov = 100,000. With $1000 to share, the minimum ever (allowing for rollover), $1000 / 100,000 = $.01, a penny per read.

So let’s speculate that in a month a person has 2000 reads of their own content, and 1000 reads of content they’ve rated. If a read is worth 1 cent then the writer will get $0.005, and a rater will get $0.001.

2000 x $0.005 = $10
1000 x $0.001 = $1

for a total of $11 a month.

My total for October should come in somewhere around $24. (Plus my level completion bonuses.)

Ratings will stay with a content item forever, so I will continue to earn with my ratings given for as long as the site is viable. With unused portions of the monthly pot rolling forward, and increased readership and authoring, the potential earnings should only increase.

With more time than sense (or cents) this month, I'm doing a lot of rating. I consider it an investment.

Check out my recent content. Sign up, if it looks like fun!

Bond Falls- A Scenic Treasure in Upper Michigan
Franmara Beverage Stirrers - Easily Re-Used
Staples Hanging Folders - Lightweight Archiving
The Dark Crystal - Special Edition - More to Love
OSN Cleaning Cloth - Safe for Lenses, Screens, CDs
Hart-Montague Rail Trail - An Easy Rural Ride
Memorex CD/DVD Sleeves - Color-coded Storage
Lowfat Butternut Squash Soup - Autumn Comfort Food
Augusta Rose - Outstanding, Friendly B&B
Japanese Technology Returns Plastic to Oil
Lowering Your Chances of a Car-Deer Collision
Eighteen Practical Uses for Used Coffee Grounds
How to Wash Dishes by Hand
Walgreens' Anti-Fungal Spray - Relief, but Messy

Shared Reviews

Friday, October 8, 2010

Big Changes at Shared Reviews


I've been a member of Shared Reviews since a couple of months after it first started. I joined in October 2007. Currently I have the #1 ranking at the site. (This could easily change!)

Since August, owner Peter Ejtel has been working hard to roll out an all-new payment and status structure. It's been tested in pieces, and the system is now live, and mostly working properly. It's a complete change from the previous method, so if you didn't care for Shared Reviews before, you might find it more appealing now. If you were involved there some, everything is changed. In either case, pay attention!

There will now be cash awarded on a monthly basis in proportion to the number of readers who visit your reviews from valid referrers. This basically means through searches or links, but not any PTC sites or link exchanges. This will be more fair. Previously you could only get paid if your review was in the top of each category.

You can also earn cash rewards for reaching specific challenge levels. It's a complex system, but basically you work to complete levels, and there is some reward at each completion. Sometimes it's points, sometimes it's cash. These awards are independent from the pageview cash awards.

If you were used to the old voting system (which lent itself to "corruption"), that is gone. In its place is a rating system. Members who have a high enough rank can rate reviews for their quality. When a rate is made the reviewer has an opportunity to edit the review to improve it. This is a long-overdue need, since there are a lot of sub-standard reviews. There are also a lot of really good ones. The current review total is 46,354... there's plenty of room for quite a range of quality!

Pageview cash awards are split between the writer and the raters. If a review has not yet been rated, the writer will still get 50% and the rest will roll over to the next month's kitty.

This explanation isn't nearly complete, but it will give you a sense of the sweeping changes. Pageview payouts are percentages of the monthly revenue, so we don't yet know what the payout will be. This is the first month of the new setup, so I don't think anyone has a clue what we are likely to earn. But the one thing we do know is that more people will earn a share of the pie.

Of course, if you have a higher rank you will earn more from the challenges earned, and the fact that you are allowed to rate others.

Check it out if you want... it's a good time to jump in. Meanwhile, here are my new reviews in September and October:

Wireless N Home Router - Basic, Sleek
Big Agnes Fly Creek Tent - Good Design, Ultra-Light
Pendaflex Sure Hook Files - Possibly Better
Hobby Lobby Raffia Basket - The Right Shape
Sleepyhead - Cute But Not Outstanding
Revere Ware 1 Gallon Steamer/ Canner - Useful
Harmony Kingdom - Tin Cat I Figurine Box - Sharks
White Acorn Squash - Bland, Disappointing
Trapped in Death Cave - Believable Adventure
Magnetic Storage - Not Just For Locker Organization
Tips for Choosing Flowering Bulbs
Hands of Jesus- Christian Bird Lover's Ideal
Pendaflex Hanging Folders - An Office Standard
Role for the Government in Controlling Sugar?
IMToo MOV Converter- Not the Best Deal
Comparing Four On-line Writing Job Venues
Little Quack's Bedtime - Cute Toddler Bedtime Book
Murders in the Rue Morgue- Classic, No Extras
Points to Consider When Planning an Autumn Hike
Adidas Defender Bag- Adequate, Too Soft
Experiment- Making Homemade Peanut Butter
Ten Relatively Painless Tips for Cutting Calories
Universal Food Grinder- For the Manual Kitchen

Shared Reviews

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Shared Reviews to Revamp Earning Opportunities




Peter Ejtel, Founder and Editor in Chief of Shared Reviews, has announced upcoming major changes to the site. Beginning with a two-month earning hiatus and transition period, then, on October 1, the new changes will go into full effect and the prediction is that members should be able to earn more than ever before.

In addition to writing reviews, the "Bounty" program will go into Beta mode. This allows writers with a high enough rank to complete writing assignments for third party clients. Payment for successful Bounty articles will be prompt.

The system of voting for reviews for monthly rankings and payments will end. Instead, revenues will be distributed proportionally to all writers based on page views from general web traffic.

Rather than voting, members will now respond to other reviewers by anonymously rating reviews with a numerical ranking and short text message.

Ejtel said, "Rank Badges will be earned through experience, such as Publishing, generating Page Views, Rating other Author’s content, acquiring Referrals, and receiving positive Ratings from other Authors."

For August and September, members will be asked to participate on a volunteer basis in order to test the new system and become accustomed to how it will work.

For the past two years, I've been ranked in the top 5 on the site almost every month. My monthly income has been between $25-$50. With the hope of increasing that amount, I am willing to continue my involvement until the return of payments in October.

If you are looking for future opportunities to write, with earning potential, this is a good time to sign up, start writing, and learn how the new system will work.

See the full announcement at the Shared Reviews Blog
Sign up at Shared Reviews

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Yahoo Acquires Associated Content


Yahoo has acquired the popular writing platform, Associated Content. With 16 million viewers a month, AC garners more hits than the New York Times. Recently AC has been encouraging regional and local news items, but one can write about almost anything, and get paid at least a minimal amount based on page views.

I suppose it was bound to happen-- an acquisition. But big changes are already announced. The biggest is that they plan to take down the web site in about nine months. What? How do they plan to serve the "news?" The article states, "Yahoo plans to sprinkle Associated Content's contributions throughout its news, sports, finance and entertainment sections."

Um... what about the other million or so entries? Will they just all disappear? Will writers continue to be paid for producing content? Will Yahoo only use news items that fit with their agenda?

For the thousands of people who have found a forum by using Associated Content, this will be a terrible blow. No one is getting rich there, but articles can be posted for performance pay only, which means that you are paid only when someone actually reads an article. The rate is very small, ranging from $1.50 to $2.00 for 1000 views, depending on your "clout." Yet, a lot of people have grown their body of work to create a small core of income each month. Does Yahoo plan to dump all that? If so, it will hardly be Associated Content any more. How does Yahoo plan to attract people to continue to write?

I have to say that I am not happy. I only get a small puddle of income from AC each month, but I had gotten nicely used to it. Holding my breath to see what the future will bring.

see Yahoo news article
I Love Hate Associated Content
My Associated Content page

Monday, March 8, 2010

Is Textbroker Worth It?


I have been a writer on Textbroker for 15 months, and have cashed out over $1700 from the site. This definitely sounds like it's worth it! But there are a couple of reservations.

First, the good parts:
  • It is the one place where I can get paid for work in just two weeks, as long as the balance is over $10. There are two cash-out dates each month.
  • There is usually a list of assignments to choose from
  • You can set your own price for Direct Orders


Now, the not so good parts:
  • The rates they pay for all but level 5 assignments are pretty low. Level 2 pays 0.7 cents a word, Level 3 is 1 cent, and Level 4 is 1.4 cents a word. You will often need to do quite a lot of research for an article, making these rates pretty awful. Level 5 is considered professional, and it pays a more reasonable 5 cents a word. Very few people make it to level 5.
  • Occasionally the assignments will taper off to almost nothing.
  • Some assignments are terrible. Clients don't always make it clear what they desire, or they may make unreasonable demands. Of course, you don't have to take those ones, but it doesn't inspire confidence in the venue.


My personal beef:
Until last week, I was a Level 5. Actually, there are very few assignments that are even available at that level, but when there was one that I could do, it was great! However, in February, they started sending me warnings about the use of commas. They sent me a reference to study the use of commas. Sigh. This is somewhat a stylistic thing, not a RULE. The editor for my book, North Country Cache, lectured me long and hard about using too many commas and made me change my style. I think TB wants all those commas back in.

But, it really doesn't matter now. The comma police have busted me back to a level 4. I don't know if I'll ever get my 5 rating back.

It is really hard to make a lot of money there. You will put in a lot of time. But you don't have to wait for weeks or months to sell the articles you write. You accept an article, write and revise it till the client is satisfied, and you get paid within a couple of weeks.

They occasionally stop accepting new authors for periods of time, but I see that they are allowing sign-ups now. Unless your English is really poor you can expect to begin at a Level 3.

Textbroker

Saturday, February 6, 2010

Actual Payment from Vertical Blogger


A couple of months ago I was offered a chance to sign up with Vertical Blogger. Since the invitation had come out of the blue I wasn't sure how legitimate it was. Also, Vertical Blogger is new, and startups are always questionable.

However, I have now written two articles for them, and have received payment. I hope more assignments come my way from them!

Vertical Blogger

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Edinburgh a hot winter destination in UK


Who isn’t stirred by the skirling of the bagpipes, and the ancient mysteries of castles? If you are ready for a winter vacation, yet also ready for a change from sun and surf, consider Scotland.

The capital, and second largest city, Edinburgh, is a fine location to base your trip. Edinburgh accommodation options are varied and numerous, offering options for a traveler on any sort of budget. One can go first class at such renowned places as the Bruntsfield, Balmoral, or The Scotsman.  But for those who desire to stay in more modest rooms there are over 150 options.

Begun recently, Scotland’s Winter White Explorer Pass can provide entry to 45 winter attractions around the country on three days, over a five-day span. Sites in and near Edinburgh include Edinburgh Castle, Craigmillar Castle, Trinity House Maritime Museum, Chrichton Castle, Linlithgow Palace, Blackness Castle, and Cairnpapple Hill. However, Scotland is a reasonably small nation, about the size of the state of South Carolina, and day trips to any of the other locations is easily accomplished.

For those seeking snowy slopes a 5-day pass to Scotland’s ski areas can be purchased for 115 pounds. They are good at all five ski centres, but must be used on consecutive days. Hiking and mountain biking are also popular winter sports in Scotland.

Within Edinburgh, there are winter festivals, museums, and plenty of shopping and theater opportunities. Hogmany celebrations (New Year’s Eve), the Robert Burns Dinner in late January (celebrates the national poet), the National Galleries, and Edinburgh’s Playhouse are sure to satisfy any needs for cultural experiences.

Another economical option for families or groups of friends is to check out Edinburgh apartments for rent. This is often a great way to save money. More people can stay in one location than at a hotel, and with the availability of a kitchen, it is usually possible to save money on food, as well. Paste into your website

Friday, January 8, 2010

Bundle Up in Endinburgh This Week


With record low temperatures recorded in Scotland this weekend, visitors to the Edinburgh area might wonder if they would have been warmer at the South Pole. Temperatures in the Highlands reached -22.3C (-8F), which was nearly as cold as it was in Antarctica. However, the Edinburgh accommodation opportunities are significantly better.

Whether one is looking for the complete luxury of the Balmoral Hotel or bottom-dollar lodgings at the Caledonian Hostel, there are plenty of places to bundle up and stay warm. The area boasts over 150 hotels ready to serve your needs. A number of Edinburgh apartments are available for rent to those who are planning an extended stay. Most have a minimum three-night stay, but can accommodate a group of people in ways that a hotel room can not. Of course, plenty of standard hotels, motels, and bed & breakfast lodgings can also be found.

With a warm place to return to a sure thing, this weekend many will brave the cold for the annual Edinburgh race around Arthur’s Seat. This annual Scotland Great Winter Run is entered by over 2000 runners, from children to the elite. The 5k route wends through Holyrood Park, and organizers expect that despite the cold the course will be clear, although they do have a backup route in mind, if needed.

So, whether you are one who will brave the cold to run, or a support person who is there to cheer someone on, or even someone with no interest in the Great Winter Run, as winter has come to Scotland, you can be sure to find plenty of suitable Edinburgh accommodation.

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Signed Up with Vertical Blogger


I received an email yesterday about an "opportunity" called Vertical Blogger. I'm always a bit wary of things like this, but I have signed up, and will see what it brings my way.

The way it is supposed to work is that "advertisers will post suggestions for blog articles. Each post needs to have a maximum of 250/300 words and will pay around £25-30 per blog. Each blog can post one article per campaign per month as long as it fits into the sector of the advertiser's campaign."

What does that mean? You choose ONE category of primary interest for your blog (you may have multiple blogs in different categories). When there are articles available on those topics you can select one and write about it. Then you get paid. Those are significant amounts they are promising per article. I don't know if they can keep that up.

It is still in Beta, and there are no articles to write posted yet.

Well, I don't know how that will work out in the long run, but they didn't ask for any information I wasn't willing to give, so I signed up. You can too, if you want.

Vertical Blogger

web ad income Dec 10 (4 blogs, 2 web sites, writing):
Adsense $.46
Adgitize $.82
Project Wonderful $.02
Clixsense $.03
My Survey $.05
Neobux $.045
______________________
Total: $1.43

Monday, November 23, 2009

Assessing My Income Opportunities


Well, I found out Friday that I am losing my best web site client. They want to go with a completely database driven site, and I don't have the software to do that. Sigh.

I need to look at possible ways to increase my income beyond just a few pennies a day. My best option is to continue to expand my online writing income. In general, here is what I currently do, with comments:
  • Textbroker- some months there are enough good assignments to make over $100, some months the offerings are garbage
  • Associated Content- I post only for Performance Views at the rate of $1.55 for 1000 views. The upfront payments process is so frustrating that I simply cannot deal with it. Here's a humorous look at that: My Wrong-Headed Journey Into AC Land. I earn about $3.50 a month there, but with effort I could earn a little more. I need to get enough articles posted that I move to a clout level 10. Then I would at least receive the highest PV rate.
  • Shared Reviews- This is a site where real people review products that they own. I've blogged about it several times. They had a good beginning and then a rocky patch where they had to sink or swim on their own earnings. They are now fairly stable. It is an advantage if you joined early, but there are still good opportunities to make some cash there if you work hard. It should only get better as the site generates more income. This month $2000 is being split among the top performers (rules defining that change from month to month). My share of the pie last month was $47.81.
  • Helium- You can write a ton of stuff for them without ever making a cent. I have sold one article there for $10, but can't cash out unless I have $20. Not a place I can talk myself into putting more effort into.
  • Contests- I have entered several writing contests this month. Of course there is no money there unless I win. Pretty iffy, but at least it gave me a chance to be a little creative
  • Undisclosed- by far, my biggest income generator is from a source I am not free to disclose at this time. Right now, I'm making about $300 a month there. But the articles are all repetitive, SEO heavy, pieces on topics of limited interest to me. I have a hard time making myself do them.

I would say that an average price (not calculated, just seat-of-the-pants estimate) per article is about $5. If I could make myself write four articles a day, I could cover my bills. Just FOUR articles. But I have to tell you, that yesterday I did three, and my brain was just about fried. They take varying amounts of research, but some take quite a bit. They have so many criteria to meet the client's SEO wishes that it can give me a headache! (Seriously... one article had 13 keywords it wanted included at least once, but not more than twice each- and two of those were primary concepts of the article with no good synonyms. They specified the number of paragraphs and subheadings. They wanted it in a natural writing style, and they wanted it all in 400 words. Took two hours, and only earned $5.50).

So... I think I'm off to write an article.

P.S. I'll report the results of the Adgitize click style poll tomorrow, with some analysis.

web ad income Nov 21 (4 blogs, 2 web sites, writing):
Adsense $.04
Adgitize $.74
Project Wonderful $.03
My Survey $.10
Clixsense $.07
Chitika $.03
Neobux $.055
______________________
Total: $.97

Friday, September 4, 2009

Textbroker Freezes Author Acceptance




I have been writing for Textbroker for almost a year. Their service is exactly what their name implies. Client need material written, people want to write. Someone in the middle needs to broker the transactions.

Authors are rated based on the quality of their work at levels 2-5. Higher level assignments pay more.

Recently, Textbroker began a blog to better communicate with their authors. Today, they have announced that they will no longer accept authors except as needed. Currently, over 23,000 people write for Textbroker. Despite the large number of writing orders Textbroker receives, it is difficult to provide enough assignments for that number of writers!

Interested writers may submit a writing sample for approval, but will only be moved into active positions as old ones become available.

Textbroker

web ad income Sept 2 (4 blogs, 2 web sites):
Adsense $.04
Adgitize $.51
Project Wonderful $.02
Shareapic $.01
______________________
Total: $.58


web income August actually cashed out (4 blogs, 2 web sites, other writing):
Adgitize (income - ad cost) -$7.06
Private Ad sold $35.00
Associated Content $2.98
______________________
Total: $30.92

Sunday, July 19, 2009

Shared Reviews - Ranking and ShareScore




Shared Reviews is a product review site which focuses on very personal interactions of people with products.

There are several different kinds of ranking systems in play for participants in the community.

Individually, there is a Quantity called ShareScore (SS). SS is supposed to be something of a measure of community responsibility. Everyone who joins enters the community with a 50% SS. Actions one takes will cause that to go up or down. The actual quantities associated with the following actions are not known to members. But from experience, and postings in the forum by the administrators, we know the following:

Ways to increase your ShareScore:
  • Post a new review- about 1%
  • Vote for reviews- not always clear- about 20 votes for 1%. Be sure to let the page fully load before you vote.
  • No one is sure if leaving comments improves SS, but it is clear that poor commenting technique will reduce it (see below)
  • If you report a review for serious offenses such as plagiarism, and that is subsequently supported by an admin review you will gain SS. Reporting minor problems such as incorrect formatting may not be worth SS.
  • Being accepted as a friend under certain circumstances.

Things that decrease your ShareScore:
  • Leaving useless comments. Short comments, or ANY comment with the word "voted" or "review" (eg. "nice review, I voted for you") in it will have a negative impact. This is because the comments become part of the body of the review which may be marketed- comments need to be relevant.
  • When you send someone a friend request your SS will drop by a point. When they accept you will get that point back. The reasoning here is that you should make contact with someone first, through a message, ask them if they want to be friends, and then completing the transaction with no net loss for anyone.
  • Having a review pulled for various offenses: putting things in the wrong category, incorrect formatting, exceptionally poor English, reviewing a service rather than a product, reviewing items that don't fit within the SR categories. If you plagiarize a review your SS won't matter because you will be banned forever.
  • If you reported a review and the administrators deem that your reason was invalid.
  • If you vote for a review that is pulled for any of these offenses, your vote will be returned, but you will lose SS. The one exception is that you will not lose SS for plagiarized reviews because it is not expected that voters check every review to see if it appears somewhere else on the web. Nevertheless, one can usually sense whether a review is an honest expression of someone's experiences. When in doubt, don't vote.
  • It was just announced that not logging in to SR for 60 days will result in a temporary decrease of SS, to reward regular participants. When an inactive member logs in their SS will return to the level it was before their hiatus.
  • Members who are banned for violations of the TOS will have their SS set to 0%

What difference does ShareScore make?
  • If you have 91-100% SS you will have the most votes to give. The actual amount may vary from month to month.
  • If you have a SS of 75-89% you will have more votes to give.
  • If you have a SS of 50-74% you will have fewer votes to give.
  • If you have a SS of 25-49% you will have even fewer votes to give.
  • If you have a SS of 0-24% you will only have one vote allowed in each category.
  • Your SS will directly affect the ranking of your reviews within a category (see below). This is quite new, and may be tweaked.
  • How the top review ("popularity")in each subcategory is determined has just changed. It used to be based solely on votes in a month. Now, the number of pageviews by people outside of SR is figured into the equation. How much those pageviews are worth is directly tied to your SS. If your SS is 100% the popularity is the number of votes plus the number of pageviews. As the SS of the author decreases the value of their pageviews also decreases.


Rank
When you go to the home page at Shared Reviews there is a parade of people who are the top 40 members on any given day will appear. How this rank is determined has just undergone some changes. It is a combination of the following factors, calculated by a formula unknown to the members: total reviews written, reviews written in the current month, votes given this month, votes received this month, friends, referrals, sharescore and total review pageviews.

Although Shared Reviews is still undergoing many changes, it is possible to rise to a good ranking position. This is the first month of the return of shared revenue. I'll report later on what kinds of amounts of income people were able to make.

Shared Reviews

web ad income July 18 (4 blogs, 2 web sites):
Adsense $.31
Adgitize $.58
Project Wonderful $.03
Shareapic $.01
______________________
Total: $.93

Saturday, July 18, 2009

Shared Reviews- Big Changes in July



Shared Reviews is a product review site which focuses on very personal interactions of people with products.

As of July 1, 2009, they are back on track to begin sharing revenue with participants. The means by which that revenue is shared can change from month to month, within a basic framework. The owners realize that the site must be able to pay for itself in order to be able to have any money to share.

For this month the total payout will be $1500. Here is how that is to be divided:
There are 424 sub-categories of products,and the total will be split evenly amongst them. The top review will earn 50% of that total, second place 30%, and third place 20%. Any amount earned by a review will be split evenly between the author receiving 50%, and the voters sharing the other 50% evenly.

For example any one category will have $1500/424 = $3.55. Of this 50% or $1.77 will go to the top review. The author of that review will get 50% of that or $.88 If 25 people voted for it they will split the remaining $.88, and earn $.88/25 = $.035 each.

There are also some contests going on:
1) Most Votes Received:
1. $25
2. $20
3. $15
4. $10
5. $5

2) Most Published Reviews:
1. $25
2. $20
3. $15
4. $10
5. $5

3) Most Popular Video Review: $50 to the top video review by votes!
4) There are several small categories where the top new review will receive $5.

Tomorrow I will explain how a person can gain what is known as Share Score, and how this will affect the ranking of a review, and a person's ranking on the site.

Shared Reviews
web ad income July 17 (4 blogs, 2 web sites):
Adsense $.57
Adgitize $.50
Project Wonderful $.02
Shareapic $.01
Clixsense $.06
______________________
Total: $1.06

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Does Shared Reviews Have a Future?

Shared Reviews has been around for almost two years, and after a hiatus of being able to pay writers, they are ready to begin revenue sharing again. All back payments owed to members have been made.

The site is committed to presenting unique, personal, and ethical reviews. People who think they can make a quick dollar by copying reviews or product information from other sites are routed out quite quickly by members who are diligent to check for plagiarism. Members have a real stake in the success of the site.

With the recent demise of Ciao, many of those members have come to Shared Reviews. Part of Ciao's failure was due to "gangs" of cheaters. Hopefully Shared Reviews can quickly identify and block the problem users.

How one earns money there is rather complex, and those who want to succeed need to read the User Guide.

But, in a nutshell, one writes reviews and also votes on the value of reviews that other people have written. In any given month the top several reviews in any sub-category will earn cash for both the writers and the people who voted for them.(For July 2009, it will be the top 3 spots.) One big change is that the amount available to be earned each month will be announced at the BEGINNING of the month. For example, $25 per sub-category.

That amount will then be allocated on a percentage scale to writers of and voters for the top spots. Earnings will not appear in real time in your profile. They are calculated at the end of each monthly cycle.

It has been a tough nine months, but Shared Reviews is to be commended for not simply folding and defaulting on all the back payments. Now they are ready to to continue to provide good, personal reviews of products, and to reward monetarily those who write them.

Check out Shared Reviews
See a list of my reviews on Shared Reviews

Saturday, April 18, 2009

Entrecard Opens Applications for Cashout- BEWARE the Insecure Form


Entrecard users will now find a link in their dashboard to the application which, when approved, will give a member the ability to cashout credits at the rate of $1 per 1000 Entrecard Credits.

This all seems straightforward enough. They do need a real life identity and PayPal email address in order to process the cashout requests. I started to fill out the application, but balked before I got to the end. They are asking for a tax ID / SS#. Note that this is an insecure form! That is my first concern.

My second concern is why they need this information at all. I make money from quite a few online sites, and unless I break the $600/year threshold, that information should not be needed at all. When income from one site rises above that (in the USA), then a W-9 form must be supplied to the payer/employer.

So, for now, I'm not signing up for cashout. You should NOT enter your SS# unless they fix this form, even if you are willing to provide it.

web ad income today (3 blogs, 2 web sites):
Adsense $.63
Adgitize $.84
Project Wonderful $.02
______________________
Total: $1.49
Total to date in April $6.74
Total in March $4.88

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Shared Reviews - Status, April 2009


Shared Reviews has been live for about 18 months. You may have seen links to the site promising that you can make $2 per review. That information is completely outdated, but that doesn't mean that you shouldn't check out the site.

The premise of Shared Reviews is that reviews of products will be written from a personal point of view. Each review is supposed to tell the user's unique experience. The site currently contains over 36,000 reviews.

Shared Reviews is a great resource to learn about many products that you may see everyday or are curious to learn about.

So, can you earn money at Shared Reviews? At, the moment, only a little bit, but there is hope that will change. Initially there was venture capital to build a body of product reviews, and then the site, like any enterprise needed to be able to pay its own way. The model, from the beginning, has been to share revenue with the writers. After a few rocky months the owners, who are very hands-on with the business, realized that they had to either allow the site to fold or place the sharing on hold until money owed to writers could be fully paid.

Currently, April 2009, the back payments are not quite caught up. However, there is hope that the revenue sharing will begin within a few more months. At the moment you can earn some small cash awards with a great expense of time each month. The owners are also taking applications for a "Bounty" program, by which good writers will be able to make extra cash by accepting brokered writing assignments.

I have belonged to Shared Reviews since October 2007. I have to say that I have never belonged to another online community like the one at SR. Newcomers will be welcomed in the forums, and encouraged. There is no clique of long-time members. I have made several good friends and even moved one of those relationships from virtual to phone calls.

I won't try to explain how one used to earn money there, because there may be changes when the revenue sharing is reinstated. But, in general one gains points by voting for other reviews and when others vote for your reviews.

For anyone who might be interested in writing product reviews I would suggest that you sign up now, write some reviews, introduce yourself in the forum, and get positioned to be a player when the opportunity to make money there returns. How much money? It's impossible to predict. But the site is now self-supporting and has survived its launch. The only way to go is up!

Shared Reviews

web ad income today (4 blogs, 2 web sites):
Adsense $.03
Adgitize $.76
Project Wonderful $.03
______________________
Total: $.82
Total to date in April $-2.93
Total in March $4.88